Key result
JSCC reference procedure for glycated albumin shows near-perfect correlation with standard HPLC methods.
Why the study?
The fundamental characteristics of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry reference measurement procedure for glycated albumin needed clarification.
Effect estimate: r = 0.999
The JSCC reference measurement procedure for glycated albumin is robust and correlates well with the HPLC method used in clinical practice.
Background To clarify the fundamental characteristics of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry reference measurement procedure (JSCC RMP) for glycated albumin (GA), an additional performance study was performed and the correlation between the HPLC method and JSCC RMP was re-evaluated. Methods Repeatability, detection limit, addition recovery, uncertainty of measurement, inter-laboratory comparison, correlation between JSCC RMP and HPLC method were evaluated. Results The coefficient of variation (CV) of the total repeatability for the nine pretreated samples including isotope dilution and hydrolysis, defining that the averages of each of nine MS measurement samples are independent measurement vials, was 1.0%( n = 9). The limit of detection and Quantification of the GA values were 7.4 and 29.5 mmol/mol, respectively. Addition recovery rates were 99.6%–100.4%. The strong correlation (r = 0.999) of measured six serum samples between two laboratories was observed. Certified values and expanded uncertainties for JCCRM 611-2 (M, H, HH) using the JSCC RMP were as follows: JCCRM 611-2M: 232 and 9 mmol/mol, JCCRM611-2H: 359 and 14 mmol/mol, JCCRM611-2HH: 556 and 22 mmol/mol, respectively. The regression equation obtained using the Passing–Bablok method was GA (%) HPLC = 0.0523 × GA (mmol/mol) JSCC RMP + 1.315. Conclusion The basic performance of the JSCC reference procedure for GA measurement was good, and similar results were obtained at other facilities, so it was considered to be robust and suitable as a reference method for GA measurement. Additionally, an equation was established to convert JSCC RMP (mmol/mol) values to the HPLC% values used in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meguro et al. (2025) studied this question. Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry reference measurement procedure (JSCC RMP) vs. HPLC method was evaluated on Correlation between JSCC RMP and HPLC method (r = 0.999). The JSCC reference measurement procedure for glycated albumin demonstrated strong inter-laboratory correlation (r = 0.999) and established an equation to convert values to the HPLC method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: