The mechanisms of the ME effect of Cr2O3 were experimentally determined at 4.2 K. For this purpose, ME susceptibility was measured statically by SQUID from 1.6 to 270 K and the electric shift of AFMR was observed at 4.2 K by an ac modulation method. The former experiment gave α∥(4.2 K) =−0.8, α∥(255 K) =15.3 and α⊥(4.2 K) =−4.7 in 10−4 cgs unit. The latter gave a frequency shift of −1.02×10−6 cm−1 at E=1 cgs in the case of both E↘ and H↘ parallel to the c axis. From these experiments, δg=−1.05×10−8 and δD=−3.3×10−6 cm−1 were deduced for E=1 cgs along the c axis. This value is not only too small but of the wrong sign to explain the sign and the magnitude of α∥ at higher temperatures. α⊥ at 4.2 K seems too large to be interpreted by the tilting of the easy axis of spins and the role of other mechanisms such as the appearance of a Dzyaloshinski interaction is suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kita et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: