Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is traditionally molecularly diagnosed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). SMA analyses are not routinely incorporated into gene panel analyses for individuals with suspected SMA or broader neuromuscular indications. Aim: We sought to determine whether a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach that integrates SMA analyses into a multigene neuromuscular disorders panel could detect undiagnosed SMA. Materials and Methods: Sequence and copy number variants of the SMN1 / SMN2 genes were simultaneously analyzed in samples from 5304 unselected individuals referred for testing using an NGS-based 122-gene neuromuscular panel. This diagnostic approach was validated using DNA from 68 individuals who had been previously diagnosed with SMA via quantitative PCR for SMN1 / SMN2 . Results: Homozygous loss of SMN1 was detected in 47 unselected individuals. Heterozygous loss of SMN1 was detected in 118 individuals; 8 had an indeterminate variant in “ SMN1 or SMN2 ” that supported an SMA diagnosis but required additional disambiguation. Of the remaining SMA carriers, 44 had pathogenic variants in other genes. Concordance rates between NGS and qPCR were 100% and 93% for SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers, respectively. Where there was disagreement, phenotypes were more consistent with the SMN2 results from NGS. Conclusion: Integrating NGS-based SMA testing into a multigene neuromuscular panel allows a single assay to diagnose SMA while comprehensively assessing the spectrum of variants that can occur in individuals with broad differential diagnoses or nonspecific/overlapping neuromuscular features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: