Key result
XGBoost models predict medical student depression severity, driven by prior depression and financial stress.
Why the study?
Medical students have higher rates of depression and depressive symptoms than the general population, necessitating understanding of factors influencing depression severity for early detection and support.
Observational (n=484,653)
Yes
Effect estimate: MAE 3.32 (95% CI 3.08-3.39)
p-value: p=<0.0024
Machine learning models identified history of depressive diagnosis, disordered eating, financial stress, and younger age as key predictors of depression severity in medical students.
May inform targeted screening in medical students; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Importance Medical students exhibit depression or depressive symptoms at a higher rate than the general population, with a potential for reduced academic performance and increased risk of suicide and physical health problems. Understanding the factors contributing to depression severity is critical for early detection and creating support systems personalized to the mental health challenges of medical students. Objective To predict and identify the key biopsychosocial factors influencing the severity of depression in medical students across the United States using explainable machine learning algorithms. Design This prognostic study is built upon survey data from the Healthy Minds Study student survey spanning the academic years of 2009 to 2021 across the US. Students’ depression severity is measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Setting All undergraduate and graduate students from the American universities participating in the Healthy Minds Study are included in our study. While our target cohort is composed of medical students only, we include undergraduate and graduate students in our population to increase the size of our data during the machine learning training process. Participants A total of 167,999 students completed the PHQ-9 inventory, including 2,174 medical students. Main Outcome and Measure Prediction accuracy is measured by the mean absolute error across a previously unseen cohort of medical students. This metric estimates the average absolute difference between the predicted and actual responses of the general medical student population. Results By testing several predictive machine learning algorithms, we found that a sequence of binary XGBoost models achieved the lowest mean absolute error amongst all interpretable algorithms. Depression severity was best predicted by factors in the following order of importance: 1. history of depressive diagnosis, 2. disordered eating behaviors, 3. current financial stress, and 4. younger age. Conclusions and Relevance By identifying predictors of student risk for developing depressive symptoms, our findings can help facilitate early identification of medical students at risk for developing depressive symptoms and providing them with early support and proactive strategies to prevent future depressive episodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Depression (n=484,653). Sequence of binary XGBoost models vs. Other machine learning models (ordinal logistic regression, support vector ordinal regression, multinomial logistic regression) was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting depression severity (MAE 3.32, 95% CI 3.08-3.39, p=<0.0024). A sequence of binary XGBoost models best predicted depression severity among medical students with a mean absolute error of 3.32, identifying prior depression, eating disorders, financial stress, and younger age as the strongest predictors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: