Key result
Diabetes linked to ~130% greater incident CVD risk in cancer survivors versus the general population.
Why the study?
Little is known about the differences in contribution of diabetes to incident cardiovascular disease between adult cancer survivors and those without history of cancer.
Does diabetes increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease more in adult cancer survivors compared to the general population?
Cohort (n=10,398)
Does diabetes increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease more in adult cancer survivors compared to the general population?
Hazard Ratio: 2.3 (95% CI 1.24–4.3)
p-value: p=0.011
Diabetes confers a significantly higher relative risk of incident cardiovascular disease in adult cancer survivors compared to the general population, highlighting the need for strict glycemic control in cardio-oncology.
May warrant closer CVD monitoring in diabetic cancer survivors; leaves open whether the interaction is causal or modifiable.
AIMS: Diabetes is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but little is known about the differences in contribution of diabetes to incident CVD between adult cancer survivors and those without history of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude of association between diabetes and CVD risk among adult cancer survivors and their general population counterparts. METHODS AND RESULTS: The National Health Insurance Service database was used to abstract data on 5199 adult cancer survivors and their general population controls in a 1:1 age- and sex-matched cohort setting. The Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for socioeconomic status, health status, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of incident CVD associated with glycaemic status in adult cancer survivors and the general population. The partial likelihood ratio test was used to compare the magnitude of the association between diabetes and CVD risk in the two groups. Compared to those without diabetes, adult cancer survivors (adjusted HR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.24-4.30) and their general population controls (adjusted HR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.02-3.58) with diabetes had a higher risk of incident cardiovascular outcomes. The magnitude of diabetes-CVD association was significantly stronger in adult cancer survivors than that in those without history of cancer (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of association between diabetes and incident CVD was stronger in adult cancer survivors as compared to that in their general population counterparts, supporting evidence for the importance of glycaemic control for prevention of CVD among those with history of cancer diagnosis and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cancer survivors (n=10,398). Diabetes vs. Without diabetes was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular outcomes (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.24-4.30, p=0.011). Diabetes was associated with a significantly stronger risk of incident cardiovascular disease in adult cancer survivors (HR 2.30; 95% CI 1.24-4.30) than in the general population (P=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: