Objectives:To assess the diagnostic role of CSF C-reactive protein quantitatively in acute meningitisand to evaluate the efficacy of CSF C-reactive protein in differentiating pyogenic meningitis fromnon-pyogenic meningitis.Material and Methods: It is a prospective observational study of total 102children with suspected meningitis allocated into three groups based on initial investigations; group-I Pyogenic meningitis, group-II Non-Pyogenic meningitis and group-III No meningitis (Controlgroup). Quantitative CSF C-reactive protein was detected by the latex agglutination method. Datawere analyzed to establish the diagnostic role of CSF-CRP and to evaluate the efficacy of CSF-CRP indifferentiating pyogenic meningitis from non-pyogenic meningitis.Results: A total of 102 clinicallysuspected meningitis patients were studied. Based on CSF findings, the study population (102cases) was categorized into 3 groups. Group I was pyogenic meningitis consist 53 cases (51.96%).Group II was Non-Pyogenic meningitis consists 27 cases (26.47%). Group III was normal CSFfindings consist 22 (21.56%). 98.1% cases of pyogenic meningitis had elevated CSF-CRP level >1.1μg/ml of CSF. In the case of Non-Pyogenic meningitis, 96.2% were found to have CSF- CRP in therange of 0.05-0.10 μg/ml. The mean value of CSF-CRP in groups I,II and III were 5.57±1.48,0.09±0.042 and 0.01±0.010 respectively. Conclusion: Detection of CSF-CRP provides a newdimension to establish the diagnosis of pyogenic meningitis. It is a rapid, reliable and sensitivediagnostic test. From this study it is concluded that CSF-CRP can be used to differentiate pyogenicfrom non-pyogenic meningitis. Early, accurate and appropriate therapy can ameliorate the morbidityand mortality rates in such cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bansal et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: