Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Currently, research investigating specific immunity to various TORCH pathogens (Toxoplasma gondii, cytomegalovirus, rubella virus) in pregnant women remains relevant. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the detection rates of the main serologic markers of TORCH in pregnant women in Saint Petersburg, Russia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the screening of pregnant women (n = 6605) was performed for the presence and levels of specific anti-Toxoplasma gondii, anti-rubella, and anti-cytomegalovirus immunoglobulins M and G in the blood. RESULTS: The rubella seroprevalence rate was 98.2% (n = 4428), with the highest number of seronegative women in the age group of 31 to 35 years. In 8.4% of cases, the serum level of anti-rubella immunoglobulin G was below the protective level. Anti-cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin G was found in 1632 (81.9%) pregnant women, with a significant age-related increase in the number of seropositive women (p 0.001). Specific anti-Toxoplasma gondii immunoglobulin G was found in 28% (n = 1375) of pregnant women. The percentage of seropositive women also increased with age (p 0.001), with the highest level reported in women aged 40 years (40.74%). CONCLUSION: The high level of rubella seroprevalence in pregnant women suggests that testing for anti-rubella antibodies should be performed only in the second trimester. Anti-cytomegalovirus screening is recommended for pregnant women with known risk factors for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. It is recommended to continue anti-Toxoplasma gondii screening because of the high percentage of Toxoplasma gondii seronegative pregnant women in Russia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: