Key result
Recurrence quantification of traditional Chinese medicine pulse signals identifies CHD patients with an AUC of 1.0.
Why the study?
Nonlinear dynamic parameters of traditional Chinese medicine pulse signals to distinguish patients with coronary heart disease from normal subjects were not established.
Does recurrence quantification analysis of traditional Chinese medicine pulse signals distinguish patients with coronary heart disease from normal subjects?
Case-Control (n=124)
Does recurrence quantification analysis of traditional Chinese medicine pulse signals distinguish patients with coronary heart disease from normal subjects?
Effect estimate: AUC 1.000 for recurrence rate
Recurrence quantification analysis of traditional Chinese medicine pulse signals demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing patients with coronary heart disease from normal subjects.
Should not yet influence coronary heart disease diagnosis; leaves open the need for prospective validation of pulse analysis.
OBJECTIVE: By using recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) to analyze traditional Chinese medicine pulse signals of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), this study aims to find nonlinear dynamic parameters of pulses to distinguish patients with CHD from normal subjects. METHODS: First, pulse signals were collected using ZBOX-I pulse digitization gathering analyzer from October 2007 to June 2008. RQA was used to analyze RQA parameters of pulses of 63 patients with CHD and 61 normal subjects. RQA parameters included recurrence rate (RR), determinism (DET), averaged diagonal length (L), entropy of diagonal length (ENTR), length of longest diagonal line (L(max)), laminarity (LAM), trapping time (TT) and length of longest vertical line (V(max)). Then, rank-sum test and BoxPlot were employed to find significant difference and distribution of RQA parameters. Lastly, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic value of the measurements with significant difference. RESULTS: There were significant differences in RQA parameters of pulse signals between the two groups, including RR, DET, L, ENTR, LAM, TT and V(max), and their areas under the ROC curves were 1.000, 0.898, 0.653, 0.673, 0.885, 0.898, 0.986 and 0.994, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with the normal subjects, the pulse signals of the patients with CHD are presented with more certainty, regularity and stability. RQA measurements of RR, TT, Vmax, DET and LAM show good diagnostic value according to their ROC curves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rui Guo (2011) conducted a case-control in Coronary heart disease (n=124). Recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) of pulse signals vs. Normal subjects was evaluated on Diagnostic value (Area under the ROC curve) of RQA parameters (AUC 1.000 for recurrence rate). Recurrence quantification analysis of traditional Chinese medicine pulse signals distinguished patients with coronary heart disease from normal subjects, with the recurrence rate yielding an AUC of 1.000.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: