Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When compared at a level of 1 ft-c for 16 hours at a night temperature of 20°C, light from 5 types of sources delayed flowering of short-day plants ( Chrysanthemum , marigold, Rieger begonia), promoted vegetative growth of 2 species of Ulmus , 2 each of Acer , and 1 of Koelreuteria, Rhododendron, Rhus , and Zelkova , and promoted flowering of long-day plants (carnation, marguerite daisy, Petunia) in the order from most to least effective: incandescent (INC) > high-pressure sodium (HPS) > > metal halide (MH) = cool white fluorescent (F) > > clear mercury (Hg). Poinsettia, Betula, Catalpa, Platanus, and Tilia continued to grow vegetatively in response to all sources. Ilex and 2 species of Pinus did not respond. Foot candles of light from HPS lamps had to be increased at least 4- to 8-fold to regulate vegetative growth of long-day plants and delay flowering of short-day plants in comparison to INC lamps. High-pressure sodium lamps were ineffective in promoting early flowering of long-day plants, regardless of intensity or duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cathey et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: