Key result
DES likely improves 5-year outcomes over BMS driven by potent anti-restenosis benefits.
Why the study?
Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting are influenced by restenosis and disease progression, and the impact of drug-eluting stents on these outcomes requires further evaluation.
Do drug-eluting stents improve 5-year clinical outcomes compared to bare-metal stents in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Do drug-eluting stents improve 5-year clinical outcomes compared to bare-metal stents in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
The long-term benefit of drug-eluting stents on 5-year outcomes will likely depend on their judicious use combined with aggressive secondary prevention therapies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports selective DES use with secondary prevention to potentially improve 5-year outcomes; leaves open need for randomized confirmation versus bare-metal stents.
Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting are determined by restenosis of the original stented lesion during the first year and, later, by disease progression at non-stented segments, owing to either gradual progression of atherosclerosis or instability of vulnerable plaques. Drug-eluting stents have demonstrated potent anti-restenosis benefits in a variety of lesion types and high-risk patients, including complex long lesions and diabetic patients. It is likely that this benefit will translate into improved 5-year outcomes, with reduction in need for repeat revascularization in many patients and possibly reduced incidence of myocardial infarction and death, especially in diabetic patients, in whom the risk for occlusive restenosis and 5-year death and myocardial infarction rates are known to be higher after bare-metal stents. Future studies will determine the role of drug-eluting stents in preventing adverse outcomes owing to later disease progression. Such strategies and proposed clinical trials may include identification and prophylactic stenting of individual vulnerable plaques or coronary segments, and comparisons with coronary artery bypass surgery for complete revascularization success. While the outlook for benefit of drug-eluting stents in 5-year outcomes is hopeful, it is likely that a true improvement in these outcomes will be realized more from a judicious use of drug-eluting stents coupled with other proven aggressive secondary prevention therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donald E. Cutlip (2006) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents vs. Bare-metal stents was evaluated. Drug-eluting stents have demonstrated potent anti-restenosis benefits, and their judicious use coupled with secondary prevention therapies is likely to improve 5-year outcomes after coronary stenting.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: