Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several driver-performance factors contribute to rear-end collisions—driver inattention, perception-reaction time, and limitations of the human visual system. Although many evaluations have examined driver response to various rear-end collision avoidance systems (RECAS) display and algorithm alternatives, little research has been directed at creating a quantitative model of driver performance to evaluate these alternatives. Current considerations of driver behavior in developing warning algorithms tend to ignore the fundamental problem of driver inattention and assume a fixed driver reaction time with no further adjustment after the initial response. A more refined model of driver response to rear-end crash scenarios can identify more appropriate and timely information to be displayed to the driver. An attention-based rear-end collision avoidance model (ARCAM) is introduced that describes the driver’s attention distribution, information extraction and judgment process, and the reaction process. ARCAM predicts the closed-loop nature of collision response performance and explains how the driver might use RECAS warnings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: