Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
. Reproductive outcomes were evaluated at postnatal day (PND) 60 and PND120, and reciprocal fecal transfer was performed between control and arsenic-fluoride (AsF) backgrounds. Developmental AsF exposure impaired sperm production and quality, disrupted reproductive hormone homeostasis, altered spermatogenic-stage markers, and induced testicular and epididymal injury. Repeated administration of AsF-donor fecal material to control recipients was accompanied by selected adverse reproductive changes, whereas control-donor material was accompanied by partial changes in the opposite direction in AsF-exposed recipients. Endpoint 16S rRNA sequencing demonstrated exposure-associated microbial community differences, and donor-material administration was accompanied by changes in selected host phenotypes. Untargeted serum metabolomics revealed prominent remodeling of bile acid- and lipid-related signals, including reciprocal Fecal microbiota transplantation-associated patterns and exploratory relationships between bile-acid-related features and reproductive hormones. These metabolic findings were accompanied by differences in colonic junction- and inflammation-related markers, intestinal-hepatic FXR-FGF15-related proteins, hepatic bile acid and lipid endpoints, and testicular autophagy-related markers. Collectively, the findings characterize reproductive hazards at the tested concentrations and support a nonexclusive gut-liver-testis framework in which donor-material-associated microbial and metabolic changes accompany partial modification of recipient phenotypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: