Autopsy study reveals infrequent comorbid brain pathologies with minimal clinical effect in multiple system atrophy, suggesting therapeutic strategies should focus primarily on alpha-synuclein.
BACKGROUND: Mixed pathology is common at autopsy for a number of age-associated neurodegenerative disorders; however, the frequency of comorbid pathologies in multiple system atrophy (MSA) and their clinical correlations are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We determined the frequency of comorbid pathologic processes in autopsy-confirmed MSA and assessed their clinical correlates. METHODS: This study included 160 neuropathologically established MSA from the Mayo Clinic brain bank. Clinical information, including age at onset or death, clinical subtype, initial symptoms, antemortem clinical diagnosis, and cognitive dysfunction was collected. We assessed comorbid pathologies including Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change, Lewy-related pathology, argyrophilic grain disease, age-related τ astrogliopathy, transactive DNA-binding protein 43 pathology, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and cerebrovascular small vessel disease and examined their clinical impact. RESULTS: The majority of MSA patients (62%) had no significant comorbid pathologies. There was a positive correlation between age at onset or death with the number of comorbid pathologies; however, even in the highest quartile group (average age at death 78 ± 6 years), the average number of comorbid pathologies was <2. Logistic regression analysis revealed that none of the assessed variables, including sex, age at onset, and the presence or absence of each comorbid pathology, were significantly associated with cognitive dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of MSA patients do not have comorbid pathologies, even in advanced age, indicating that MSA is unique among neurodegenerative disorders in this regard. There was minimal clinical impact of comorbid pathologies in MSA. These findings warrant focusing on α-synuclein for the treatment strategy for MSA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekiya et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: