Key result
SPOT imaging increases scar-to-blood contrast ~19-fold vs conventional LGE, identifying more ablation lesions.
Why the study?
Myocardial lesion visualization after ablation is often impaired by poor contrast at the blood-scar interface on conventional bright-blood LGE images.
Does the SPOT CMR sequence improve the visualization of myocardial lesions post radiofrequency ablation compared to conventional bright-blood LGE in a sheep model?
Does the SPOT CMR sequence improve the visualization of myocardial lesions post radiofrequency ablation compared to conventional bright-blood LGE in a sheep model?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.6% vs 0.4%
p-value: p=<0.01
The novel SPOT CMR sequence significantly improves scar-to-blood contrast and lesion detection post-radiofrequency ablation compared to conventional bright-blood LGE in a preclinical model.
Should not change clinical LGE protocols; hypothesis-generating for post-ablation scar imaging in humans.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): This research was supported by funding from the French National Research Agency under grant agreements Equipex MUSIC ANR-11-EQPX-0030, ANR-21-CE17-0034-01 and Programme d’Investissements d’Avenir ANR-10-IAHU04-LIRYC, and from the European Council under grant agreement ERC n715093. AB acknowledges a Lefoulon-Delalande Foundation fellowship administered by the Institute of France. Background Bright-blood late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can identify the sites that were ablated during prior ablation procedures (1). However, myocardial lesions visualization is often impaired by the poor contrast at the blood-scar interface on conventional bright-blood-LGE images. Purpose To assess the performance of a novel joint bright- and black-blood LGE (SPOT) technique to visualize myocardial lesions post ablation. Methods Three sheep (age 2 years, body weight 51.6 kg) underwent radiofrequency ablation at multiple endocardial and epicardial sites. The animals were imaged 3 months later on a 1.5-T CMR scanner using conventional post-contrast bright-blood LGE (PSIR) (1) and the proposed SPOT (2) sequences. The SPOT sequence sampled the data to simultaneously generate a black-blood image (for scar visualization) and a bright-blood image (for scar localization) in a free-breathing 2-dimensional multi-slice scan (2). A coloured representation of myocardial scarring was then generated through image fusion. A reader graded the relative scar-to-myocardium, scar-to-blood, and blood-to-myocardium contrasts and the presence of LGE on all datasets. Results Compared with the reference bright-blood LGE images, the average scar-to-myocardium relative contrast in the SPOT images significantly increased by 102.5% to 8.1±4.4 (P<0.01). Similarly, a significant increase in scar-to-blood relative contrast (0.4±0.6 vs. 7.6±4.9, P<0.01) was observed. Owing to the nulling of both blood and normal myocardium signal, a significant decrease in blood-to-myocardium relative contrast (2.5±1.8 vs. 0.2±0.4, P<0.01) was observed with SPOT. A total of 7 and 12 lesions could be identified on conventional bright-blood LGE and proposed SPOT images, respectively (Figure). Conclusion The higher scar-to-blood relative contrast with SPOT imaging enables the improved visualization of myocardial lesions post radiofrequency ablation. SPOT offers a promising technology for the non-invasive assessment of myocardial injuries post ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bustin et al. (2022) studied Myocardial lesions post radiofrequency ablation (n=3). Joint bright- and black-blood LGE (SPOT) technique vs. Conventional post-contrast bright-blood LGE (PSIR) was evaluated on Scar-to-blood relative contrast (p=<0.01). The SPOT imaging technique significantly increased scar-to-blood relative contrast compared to conventional bright-blood LGE (7.6 vs 0.4, P<0.01), identifying more ablation lesions (12 vs 7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: