Key result
Novel adhesive strip ECG yields ~88% diagnostic quality recordings and predicts atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
The rising health care costs require innovative low-cost effective strategies for patient care, and remote ECG monitoring may improve care quality and reduce hospitalizations.
Does a novel adhesive strip ECG sensor provide diagnostic quality recordings and detect atrial fibrillation in ambulatory individuals?
Observational
Does a novel adhesive strip ECG sensor provide diagnostic quality recordings and detect atrial fibrillation in ambulatory individuals?
A novel adhesive strip ECG sensor yields high-quality diagnostic recordings and accurately detects atrial fibrillation in ambulatory settings.
Remote ECG monitoring appears feasible for rhythm detection; leaves open whether it reduces hospitalizations or improves outcomes.
The increase in health care costs is not sustainable and has heightened the need for innovative low cost effective strategies for delivering patient care.Remote monitoring holds great promise for preventing or shortening duration of hospitalization even while improving quality of care.We therefore conducted a proof of concept study to examine the quality of electrocardiograph (ECG) recordings obtained remotely and to test its potential utility in detecting harmful rhythms such as atrial fibrillation.We tested a novel adhesive strip ECG monitor and assessed the ECG quality in ambulatory individuals.2630 ECG strips were analyzed and classified as: Sinus, atrial fibrillation (AF), indeterminate, or other.Four readers independently rated ECG quality: 0: Noise; 1: QRS complexes seen, but P-wave indeterminate; 2: QRS complexes seen, P-waves seen but poor quality; and 3: Clean QRS complexes and P-waves.The combined average rating was: Noise 12%; R-R, no P-wave 10%; R-R, no PR interval 18%; and R-R with PR interval 60% (if Sinus).If minimum diagnostic quality was a score of 1, 88% of strips were diagnostic.There was moderate to high agreement regarding quality (weighted Kappa statistic values; 0.58 to 0.76) and high level of agreement regarding ECG diagnosis (ICC = 0.93).A highly variable RR interval (HRV ≥ 7) predicted AF (AUC = 0.87).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruce et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation. Novel adhesive strip ECG monitor was evaluated on Diagnostic quality of ECG strips (score ≥ 1). A novel adhesive strip ECG monitor produced diagnostic quality recordings in 88% of 2630 strips from ambulatory individuals, and a highly variable RR interval predicted atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.87).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: