This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Novel spinel hollow nanofibers were synthesized by a convenient single-nozzle electrospinning technique. Based on the composition and morphology results by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), a ‘gas-push’ model was proposed to elucidate the formation mechanism of hollow nanofibers during calcination. Photoluminescence (PL) properties of calcined ZnAl2O4: xCr3+ and MgAl2O4: xCr3+ nanofibers were investigated systematically. Under an excitation of 400 nm or 530–550 nm (4A2g→4T1g or 4A2g→4T2g transitions of Cr3+ ions), an emission band at 675–725 nm including a sharp emission line (R-line) at ∼687 nm with several vibrational sidebands was obtained. Compared with the spectroscopic properties of ZnAl2O4: xCr3+ nanofibers, the emission band was broadened and the decay lifetime was shortened for MgAl2O4: xCr3+ nanofibers. By calculation of crystal field strength, the value of Dq/B is estimated to be 3.25 and 2.72 for ZnAl2O4: xCr3+ and MgAl2O4: xCr3+ nanofibers, respectively. The difference of crystal field strength gives a good explanation of the spectroscopic and decay evolution between ZnAl2O4: xCr3+ and MgAl2O4: xCr3+ nanofibers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: