Key result
Medical emergency teams are linked to decreased mortality and cardiac arrests despite poor study methodology.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of medical emergency teams (METs) on inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrests, and ICU admissions remains uncertain due to limited randomized trials and methodological flaws.
Does the implementation of a medical emergency team (MET) reduce inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrests, or unscheduled ICU admissions in hospitalized patients?
Systematic Review (n=24)
Does the implementation of a medical emergency team (MET) reduce inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrests, or unscheduled ICU admissions in hospitalized patients?
Medical emergency teams may reduce inpatient mortality and cardiac arrests, but the current evidence base is limited by methodological flaws and requires improved implementation and evaluation.
This paper presents a review of literature on the impact of the medical emergency team (MET) on inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrests or unscheduled intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. A total of 14,172 abstracts and 98 full text papers were reviewed. In total, 24 met the inclusion criteria, 2 used a cluster-randomized controlled trial, 11 before and after, 6 retrospective analyses, 4 prospective cohorts and 1 not reported. There is moderate to strong evidence that METs are associated with decreased mortality and cardiac arrest rates, and weak evidence on its impact on ICU admission rate reductions. This evidence suffers from the flaws with only two randomized controlled trials examining differing outcome measures with differing results. Poor methodology and failure to report both quality improvement co-interventions and time response rates of METs, limit the strength of the evidence that METs are effective interventions for preventing mortality, code rates or unscheduled ICU admissions. Studies with improved implementation practices and evaluation of the efficacy of MET is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laurens et al. (2010) conducted a systematic review in Inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrests, or unscheduled ICU admissions (n=24). Medical emergency teams (MET) vs. Standard care / No MET was evaluated on Inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrests, or unscheduled ICU admissions. Medical emergency teams were associated with decreased mortality and cardiac arrest rates across 24 studies, though evidence is limited by poor methodology and conflicting results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: