Key result
Catheter ablation terminates typical atrial flutter and restores sinus rhythm in a tricuspid bioprosthesis patient.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation has been rarely described after atrioventricular valve replacement despite myocardial scars from heart surgery being a source of tachycardia.
Does catheter ablation safely terminate atrial flutter in a patient with a tricuspid valve bioprosthesis?
Case Report (n=1)
Does catheter ablation safely terminate atrial flutter in a patient with a tricuspid valve bioprosthesis?
Safe mapping and catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter is feasible in patients with a prior tricuspid valve replacement.
May support ablation feasibility after tricuspid bioprosthesis; leaves open need for systematic study in larger cohorts.
Myocardial scars from heart surgery are a source of tachycardia, eventually causing late morbidity and sudden death. In general, catheter ablation has been shown to be an effective therapy for various rhythm disorders, but it has been rarely described after atrioventricular valve replacement. We report on a 45-year-old man who developed atrial flutter after implantation of a tricuspid valve bioprosthesis. An electrophysiological investigation revealed typical type-I counterclockwise atrial flutter that was successfully terminated by catheter ablation. A sinus rhythm was restored and remained stable during the course of treatment; the valvular function was not diminished. It is demonstrated that safe mapping and ablation of typical atrial flutter is possible after a tricuspid valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordbeck et al. (2009) conducted a case report in Atrial flutter after tricuspid valve replacement (n=1). Catheter ablation was evaluated on Termination of atrial flutter and restoration of sinus rhythm. Catheter ablation successfully terminated typical type-I counterclockwise atrial flutter and restored stable sinus rhythm in a patient with a tricuspid valve bioprosthesis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: