Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The direct and selective extraction of Am(III) from simulated PUREX raffinate is demonstrated using a novel combination of the lipophilic extractant CyMe4BTPhen (2,9-bis(5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobenzo[e]-[1,2,4]triazin-3-yl)-1,10-phenanthroline) and the hydrophilic complexant TEDGA (N,N,N’,N’-tetraethyl-diglycolamide) to enhance selectivity toward Am(III) extraction. Separation factors (SF) of up to SFAm/Cm = 4.9 were observed in tracer experiments using this combination of CyMe4BTPhen and TEDGA. Distribution ratios of stable isotopes of fission and activation products contained in a simulated PUREX raffinate solution are reported for the first time with CyMe4BTPhen, and some co-extracted metal ions are identified. The metal ions partly co-extracted from the simulated PUREX raffinate solution were Cu, Pd, Cd, Ag, Ni, and to a lesser extent Sn and Mo. The co-extraction of Pd and Ag was successfully suppressed using Bimet ((2S,2’S)-4,4’-(ethane-1,2-diylbis(sulfanediyl))bis(2-aminobutanoic acid)). The extraction was also studied as a function of the TEDGA concentration. The distribution ratios of Am and Cm can be adjusted by variation of the TEDGA concentration to yield DAm values >1 and DCm values <1. Separation factors for Am(III) over Cm(III) of up to SFAm/Cm = 2.4 were observed in these experiments. For Ln(III) + Y(III), distribution ratios below 1 were observed, thus enabling a direct extraction of Am(III) from simulated PUREX raffinate with a sufficient selectivity against trivalent lanthanides and Cm(III).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lange et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: