Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine if the three-step Luria test is useful for differentiating between cognitive disorders. METHODS: A retrospective record review of performance on the three-step Luria test was conducted on 383 participants from a university-based dementia clinic. The participants ranged in their diagnosis from frontotemporal dementia (FTD; n = 43), Alzheimer disease (AD; n = 153), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 56), and normal controls (NC; n = 131). Performance of the Luria test was graded as normal or abnormal. RESULTS: An abnormal test occurred in 2.3% of NC, 21.4% of MCI, 69.8% of FTD, and 54.9% of AD subjects. The frequency of abnormal tests in all diagnostic groups increased with functional impairment as assessed by the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). When CDR = 3 (severe), 100% of the FTD and 72.2% of the AD subjects had abnormal Luria tests. CONCLUSIONS: The three-step Luria test distinguished NC and persons with MCI from FTD and AD, but did not distinguish FTD from AD subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiner et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: