Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A likelihood statistic constructed from positions and positional uncertainties identifies 82 associations of BATSE sources with rich, concentrated Abell clusters. Random simulations indicate that 42 ± 9 of these pairs are chance associations. Among the approximately 40 physically associated cluster-gamma-ray burst (GRB) pairs (the nearest containing the Coma Cluster and GRB 2193), we find (1) a plateau between 15.8 and 16.2 mag in the integral (observed-minus-random) number distribution of m R (10), the magnitude of 10th brightest cluster member, which may indicate the presence of two burst populations with different characterstic intrinsic luminosities; (2) the dispersion in GRB fluences between 100 and 300 keV (represented as apparent magnitude, m [100-300 keV]) is smaller for bursts paired with m R (10) ≤ 16.2 clusters than for those with m R (10) > 16.2; (3) the average 100-300 keV isotropic intrinsic energy of GRBs associated with m R (10) ≤ 16.2 clusters with known redshift z < 0.07 (10 clusters including Coma) is ≃3.4 ± 2.3 × 10 49 ergs; (4) the apparent luminosity of these 10 GRBs is anticorrelated with burst duration, t 90 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.87, nonzero at between 99% and 99.9% confidence level); and (5) the absolute luminosity, L 1024 , of these 10 GRBs is more strongly anticorrelated with t 90 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.93, nonzero at >99.9% confidence level). The slope of this relation indicates t 90 ∝ L −1 1024 . These results suggest that the anticorrelation of apparent burst magnitude with duration is an intrinsic property of the bursts and is not caused by cosmological time dilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Struble et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: