Key result
Certoparin, dalteparin, and enoxaparin comparably inhibit coagulation activation markers with no difference between groups.
Why the study?
The comparative effects of different low molecular weight heparin preparations on in vivo hemostatic system activation in humans were not fully characterized.
Do different low molecular weight heparins (certoparin, dalteparin, and enoxaparin) differ in their inhibition of hemostatic system activation in healthy subjects?
RCT (n=15)
Double-blind
Cross-over
Do different low molecular weight heparins (certoparin, dalteparin, and enoxaparin) differ in their inhibition of hemostatic system activation in healthy subjects?
Different low molecular weight heparins (certoparin, dalteparin, enoxaparin) provide comparable inhibition of in vivo hemostatic system activation.
LMWHs can be used interchangeably; confirms equivalent in vivo effects among certoparin, dalteparin, and enoxaparin.
In a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study the effects of single subcutaneous doses of 120 anti-Xa units/kg body wt. of three different low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) preparations were investigated in 15 healthy subjects by determination of thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), prothrombin fragment 1.2 (f1.2), and beta-thromboglobin (beta-TG) in shed blood and in venous blood. Certoparin, dalteparin, and enoxaparin significantly inhibited coagulation activation marker formation in shed blood. The substantial inhibition of TAT and f1.2 formation was slightly more pronounced in response to certoparin. beta-TG was decreased following certoparin and enoxaparin, but not following dalteparin. However, no difference between groups was detectable. A small but consistent decrease of f1.2 formation in venous blood was noted for all LMWHs and dalteparin and enoxaparin, but not certoparin, inhibited TAT formation. Only a minor impact of the three LMWH preparations was noted on beta-TG plasma concentrations. Our data indicate that the studied LMWH preparations have a major impact on blood clotting in the activated state and inhibit in vivo the hemostatic system to a comparable extent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolzt et al. (1997) conducted an RCT in Healthy subjects (n=15). Certoparin, dalteparin, and enoxaparin vs. Cross-over comparison between the three LMWHs was evaluated on Coagulation activation marker formation (TAT, f1.2, beta-TG) in shed and venous blood. Certoparin, dalteparin, and enoxaparin significantly inhibited coagulation activation marker formation in shed blood to a comparable extent, with no detectable difference between groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: