Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inclusive education is often framed as a policy objective or a set of pedagogical strategies for accommodating learner diversity. This article reframes inclusion as a culturally situated moral practice enacted through teachers’ everyday ethical judgement. Rather than presenting empirical findings, it develops a philosophical – interpretive account of how moral reasoning about disability, responsibility and care takes shape in Muslim Turkic school settings, with primary attention to post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Drawing on Islamic ethical vocabularies – raḥma, iḥsān, adab, taklīf, and ibtilā’ – and on the institutional legacy of Soviet defectology and the article argues that inclusion is shaped by three interacting features: Islamic frameworks of obligation and care, a persistent institutional inheritance, and kinship-based responsibility beyond the parent – school dyad. Together, these dimensions present inclusion as an ongoing ethical process rather than a purely technical or policy-driven task, contributing to philosophical debates on the moral foundations of inclusive education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kauanova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: