Key result
Lack of anticoagulation is linked to poor outcomes in Loeffler endocarditis with intracardiac thrombus.
Why the study?
Loeffler endocarditis with intracardiac thrombus in hypereosinophilic syndrome is a rare condition with high mortality and limited evidence on characteristic features and management.
Does anticoagulant therapy and steroid use improve outcomes in patients with Loeffler endocarditis and intracardiac thrombus?
Systematic Review (n=33)
Does anticoagulant therapy and steroid use improve outcomes in patients with Loeffler endocarditis and intracardiac thrombus?
Loeffler endocarditis with intracardiac thrombus carries a high risk of mortality and thromboembolic complications, highlighting the potential benefit of early diagnosis with CMR and treatment with steroids and anticoagulation.
Embolic stroke may herald Loeffler endocarditis with thrombus in HES; this case leaves open optimal screening and therapy.
BACKGROUND: Loeffler endocarditis is a relatively rare and potentially life-threatening heart disease. This study aimed to identify the characteristic features of Loeffler endocarditis with intracardiac thrombus on a background of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). CASE PRESENTATION: We described a 57-year-old woman with Loeffler endocarditis and intracardiac thrombus initially presenting with neurological symptoms, who had an embolic stroke in the setting of HES. After cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), corticosteroids and warfarin were administered to control eosinophilia and thrombi, respectively. During a 10-month follow-up, the patient performed relatively well, with no adverse events. We also systematically searched PubMed and Embase for cases of Loeffler endocarditis with intracardiac thrombus published until July 2021. A total of 32 studies were eligible and included in our analysis. Further, 36.4% of recruited patients developed thromboembolic complications, and the mortality rate was relatively high (27.3%). CMR was a powerful noninvasive modality in providing diagnostic and follow-up information in these patients. Steroids were administered in 81.8% of patients, achieving a rapid decrease in the eosinophil count. Also, 69.7% of patients were treated with anticoagulant therapy, and the thrombus was completely resolved in 42.4% of patients. Heart failure and patients not treated with anticoagulation were associated with poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac involvement in HES, especially Loeffler endocarditis with intracardiac thrombus, carries a pessimistic prognosis and significant mortality. Early steroids and anticoagulation therapy may be beneficial once a working diagnosis is established. Further studies are needed to provide evidence-based evidence for managing this uncommon manifestation of HES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Loeffler endocarditis with intracardiac thrombus (n=33). Anticoagulation therapy vs. No anticoagulation therapy was evaluated on Mortality. In patients with Loeffler endocarditis and intracardiac thrombus, the mortality rate was 27.3%, and the absence of anticoagulation treatment was significantly associated with poor outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: