Key result
Portable insulin pumps reduce mean blood glucose ~47% vs conventional therapy in unstable diabetes.
Why the study?
The long-term feasibility and comparative effectiveness of insulin infusion via portable pumps through subcutaneous, intravenous, and intraperitoneal routes in severely unstable diabetic individuals were unclear.
Does intraperitoneal insulin infusion via portable pumps improve diabetic control and long-term feasibility compared to subcutaneous or intravenous routes in severely unstable diabetic individuals?
Comparison
Subcutaneous vs intravenous vs intraperitoneal insulin infusion via portable pumps
Design
Randomized trial with three 1-month infusion periods per patient
Follow-up
10-18 months
Authors
Loading...
May support implanted catheter pumps in select unstable diabetes; leaves open randomized confirmation of safety and efficacy.
RCT (n=6)
randomized
Does intraperitoneal insulin infusion via portable pumps improve diabetic control and long-term feasibility compared to subcutaneous or intravenous routes in severely unstable diabetic individuals?
Absolute Event Rate: 126% vs 237%
Intraperitoneal insulin infusion via portable pumps provides sustained improvement in glycemic control for brittle diabetes and appears more feasible long-term than subcutaneous or intravenous routes due to fewer catheter complications.
Sélam et al. (1983) conducted an RCT in Brittle Diabetes (n=6). Constant insulin infusion via portable pumps vs. Conventional therapy was evaluated on Mean blood glucose (mg/dl). Long-term constant insulin infusion via portable pumps improved mean blood glucose (126 vs 237 mg/dl) and HbA1 (8.3% vs 10.0%) compared to conventional therapy in unstable diabetic individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: