Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction The JAVELIN Lung 101 phase 1b/2 trial evaluated avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) combined with lorlatinib or crizotinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) in ALK -positive or ALK -negative advanced NSCLC, respectively. Methods Starting doses of lorlatinib 100 mg once daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily were administered with avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Primary objectives were assessment of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose in phase 1 and objective response rate in phase 2. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and confirmed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Results In the avelumab plus lorlatinib group ( ALK -positive; n = 31; 28 in phase 1b; three in phase 2), two of 28 assessable patients (7%) had DLT, and the MTD and recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. In the avelumab plus crizotinib group ( ALK -negative; n = 12; all phase 1b), five of 12 assessable patients (42%) had DLT, and the MTD was exceeded with avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus crizotinib 250 mg twice daily; alternative crizotinib doses were not assessed. Objective response rate was 52% (95% confidence interval, 33%–70%) with avelumab plus lorlatinib (complete response, 3%; partial response, 48%) and 25% (95% confidence interval, 6%–57%) with avelumab plus crizotinib (all partial responses). Conclusions Avelumab plus lorlatinib treatment in ALK -positive NSCLC was feasible, but avelumab plus crizotinib treatment in ALK -negative NSCLC could not be administered at the doses tested. No evidence of increased antitumor activity was observed in either group. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02584634
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solomon et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: