This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 181 as a potential biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) pathology in the early stages of the disease, as a valuable marker for tauopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), 32 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and 14 AD demented (AD-d) patients underwent plasma p-tau181 analysis with SiMoA assay. Twenty-six SCD, 32 MCI and 14 AD-d patients also underwent CSF biomarkers analysis (Aβ1-42, Aβ1-42/1-40, p-tau, t-tau) and were classified as carriers of AD pathology (AP+) when A+ was associated with T+ (regardless of N), or non-carriers (AP-) when they were A- (regardless of T and N), or A+/T-/N-, or A+/T-/N+ according to the A/T(N) system. RESULTS: Plasma p-tau181 levels were higher in SCD AP+ than in SCD AP- (2.85 ± 0.53 vs 1.73 ± 0.64, p < 0.001), and in MCI AP+ than in MCI AP- (4.03 ± 1.07 vs 2.04 ± 0.87, p < 0.001). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, AP status was the only variable that influenced plasma p-tau181 (B = 1.670 [95% CI 1.097:2.244], p < 0.001). Plasma p-tau181 was highly accurate for discriminating between AP+ and AP- patients (AUC = 0.910). We identified a cut-off level of 2.69 pg/mL to distinguish between AP+ and AP- (sensibility 0.86, specificity 0.82, PPV 75.00% NPV 90.32%). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma p-tau181 levels were influenced by the presence of underlying AD pathology, independently from the cognitive status and were highly accurate in differentiating SCD-MCI patients who were carriers of AD pathology from non-carriers. Plasma p-tau181 might be a promising non-invasive biomarker of AD pathology at a very early stage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giacomucci et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: