Key result
Lipocollect 200 apheresis reduces Lp(a) by ~60% and lowers LDL in two hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia patients.
Why the study?
Therapeutic options to lower lipoprotein(a) are limited, and LDL apheresis is the most effective method to significantly reduce plasma Lp(a) concentration.
Does LDL Lp(a) apheresis with Lipocollect 200 reduce plasma Lp(a) and lipid levels in patients with hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia and progressive coronary heart disease?
Case Report (n=2)
No
Does LDL Lp(a) apheresis with Lipocollect 200 reduce plasma Lp(a) and lipid levels in patients with hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia and progressive coronary heart disease?
The Lipocollect 200 LDL Lp(a)-adsorber effectively and safely reduces plasma Lp(a) and other atherogenic lipids in patients with hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia and progressive coronary heart disease.
Supports Lp(a) reduction with Lipocollect 200 in hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia; leaves open whether it improves outcomes in progressive CHD.
Therapeutic means to lower Lp(a) are limited. The most effective method to reduce plasma Lp(a) concentration significantly is therapeutic apheresis, namely, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) apheresis. A novel technique based on reusable LDL adsorber called Lipocollect 200 (Medicollect, Rimbach, Germany) allows the removal of both LDL and Lp(a) from plasma. Two male patients with hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia and angiographically established progressive coronary heart disease, without rough elevation of LDL-cholesterol, who did not respond to diet and medication were submitted to 50 LDL Lp(a) aphereses with Lipocollect 200 LDL Lp(a)-adsorber at weekly and biweekly intervals. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol plasma levels fell significantly by 48.3% (+/-6.7) to 61.6% (+/-12.7) (first patient), and 42.5% (+/-6.3) to 60.6% (+/-14.3) (second patient), respectively (all differences: P < or = 0.001). High-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol concentration in plasma did not show statistically significant change. Plasma triglycerides were also significantly reduced by 43.6% (+/-24.4) (first patient) and 42.3% (+/-13) (second patient) (both differences: P < or = 0.001). Plasma Lp(a) showed a statistically significant percent reduction in plasma as expected: 64.7 +/- 9.5 (first patient), and 59.1 +/- 6.7 (second patient) (both differences: P < or = 0.001). Plasma fibrinogen concentration was decreased by 35.9% (+/-18.7) (P < or = 0.05) (first patient) and 41.8% (+/-11.5) (second patient) (P < or = 0.005). Considering the reduction rate between the first and the last procedures, we have compared the mean percent reduction of the first five treatments (from session #1 to #5) with the last five treatments (from session #21 to #25). We have observed an increasing reduction of all activity parameters on both patients apart from HDL-cholesterol (first patient) and triglyceride (second patient) that showed a decreasing reduction rate. Both patients followed the prescribed schedule and completed the study. Clinically, all sessions were well tolerated and undesired reactions were not reported. The Lipocollect 200 adsorber proved to have a good biocompatibility. In this study, the adsorber reusability for several sessions was confirmed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefanutti et al. (2009) conducted a case report in HyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia and progressive coronary heart disease (n=2). LDL Lp(a) apheresis (Lipocollect 200) was evaluated on Reduction in plasma Lp(a) and LDL cholesterol (p=<=0.001). LDL Lp(a) apheresis using the Lipocollect 200 adsorber significantly reduced plasma Lp(a) by 59.1-64.7% and LDL cholesterol by 42.5-61.6% in two patients with hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia (P<=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: