Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines the effectiveness of rehabilitation versus punishment in Pakistan's criminal justice system, focusing on overcrowded prisons, limited rehabilitation programs, and social stigma among former offenders. A qualitative approach was employed, employing case studies, literature reviews, and legal documents to explore existing rehabilitation programs, punitive measures, and restorative justice measures. Analysis of data revealed systemic issues, such as inadequate funding, untrained personnel, and weak post-release support that limit the effectiveness of rehabilitation. Results show that punitive measures are not enough to deter crime since socio-economic factors such as poverty and unemployment remain significant drivers. Rehabilitation programs, though promising, must be extended, funded better, and coupled with restorative justice measures. The study recommends policy changes to balance punishment and rehabilitation, public awareness campaigns, and post-release reintegration assistance to reduce recidivism. These changes can make Pakistan's criminal justice system more sustainable and fair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Irfan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: