Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
COSO's (2004) framework on Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) makes a valuable contribution to the emerging practice of ERM, but suffers serious limitations. It fails to provide a workable standard for identifying ERM effectiveness. Its definition of 'risk' diverts attention from opportunities and from uncertainties that fall outside its closed rational systems perspective. By taking a command and control approach, it ignores shared management of uncertainties with external parties and social implications of ERM. As a result, threats will be created if this framework is widely followed, which seems likely as ERM is institutionalised within regulations, professional practice and expected norms of good management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dermot Williamson (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: