Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A prospective study of 217 patients was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of standard manual testing and of a new method, termed confrontational testing, for detecting weakness of the intrinsic muscles of the hand. Electrodiagnostic testing was used to identify the presence of any neurological disorder and to provide a control for the manual testing methods. Standard manual testing of the muscles innervated by the ulnar nerve revealed a sensitivity of 14 per cent, a specificity of 100 per cent, a predictive value of a positive result of 100 per cent, and a predictive value of a negative result of 57 per cent. Confrontational testing of the muscles innervated by the ulnar nerve revealed a sensitivity of 82 per cent, a specificity of 100 per cent, a predictive value of a positive result of 100 per cent, and a predictive value of a negative result of 87 per cent. Standard manual testing of the muscles innervated by the median nerve revealed a sensitivity of 6 per cent, a specificity of 100 per cent, a predictive value of a positive result of 100 per cent, and a predictive value of a negative result of 49 per cent. Confrontational testing of the muscles innervated by the median nerve revealed a sensitivity of 16 per cent, a specificity of 100 per cent, a predictive value of a positive result of 100 per cent, and a predictive value of a negative result of 52 per cent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ralph M. Buschbacher (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: