Key result
Training workloads and ACWR vary weekly but show no positional differences in female lacrosse players.
Why the study?
In-season variations of acute:chronic workload ratio across different player positions in collegiate female lacrosse athletes were not well described.
Observational (n=15)
No
p-value: p=0.434
Weekly training volumes and acute:chronic workload ratios fluctuate significantly across a collegiate women's lacrosse season, but do not differ significantly by player position.
Position-specific ACWR patterns in women's lacrosse may guide monitoring; leaves open prospective validation for injury or performance outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to describe the in-season variations of acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) of distance, high intensity distance (HID), sprints, accelerations, and decelerations between player positions of a Division I collegiate women’s lacrosse team. Data were collected via wearable microtechnology across a total of 17 games and 64 training sessions on a total of 15 participants (attackers n=5, midfielders n=5, defenders n=5). ACWRs were calculated weekly by dividing the workload from the past seven days by the workload from the past 28 days for each metric. Two repeated measures analyses of variance (RM-ANOVA) were used to compare positional differences and weekly changes in all five metrics for 1) ACWR and 2) weekly training totals. There were several differences in weekly totals and ACWRs across all five metrics evaluated (p<.05), but no positional differences were noted. Apart from the early training weeks, ACWR primarily stayed within the optimal window of 0.8-1.5 to maximize performance and reduce injury risk. These data indicate that there is variation in weekly totals for the main five metrics studied that cause “spikes” and “valleys” in workload. However, the athletes had built enough of a base in their chronic workload that it did not affect their ACWR to move outside of the optimal window. Using this information, coaches and team physicians can more effectively program training not only to optimize performance, but also to limit injuries, fatigue, and lack of fitness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wojciechowski et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Healthy collegiate female lacrosse athletes (n=15). Player position (attackers, midfielders, defenders) vs. Between positions was evaluated on Positional differences in weekly training totals and acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) (p=0.434). In a 15-week observational study of 15 collegiate female lacrosse players, training workload and acute:chronic workload ratios varied significantly by week (p<0.001) but not by player position.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: