Key result
Structured group BP education faces feasibility challenges in early CKD with ~30% recruitment.
Why the study?
A structured group educational intervention to improve blood pressure self-management in people with chronic kidney disease was tested for feasibility and patient acceptability.
Does a structured group educational intervention improve acceptability and self-management of blood pressure in patients with early CKD and hypertension?
RCT (n=81)
Open-label
1:1 in blocks of six
No
Does a structured group educational intervention improve acceptability and self-management of blood pressure in patients with early CKD and hypertension?
A structured group educational intervention for blood pressure management in CKD patients faces significant feasibility challenges due to low recruitment and high non-attendance rates.
High satisfaction among attendees supports acceptability; recruitment/attendance barriers leave optimal delivery open for CKD BP education.
Objectives We aimed to test, at pilot level, a structured group educational intervention to improve self-management of blood pressure in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The current paper explores patient acceptability of the intervention. Design This was an open randomised pilot trial. Participants were randomly assigned to either: A control group (n=41) receiving standard clinical management of hypertension. An intervention group (n=40) receiving standard clinical care plus the educational intervention. Setting Renal outpatient clinics at a single study centre. Participants Patients with early CKD and hypertension were identified and approached for recruitment. Intervention An evidence-based structured group educational intervention (CHEERS) using the principles of social cognitive theory to improve knowledge and self-management skills. Outcomes Recruitment, uptake of the intervention and patient satisfaction were evaluated to explore patient acceptability of the intervention and to determine any differences between patients regarding recruitment and retention. Measures Data on age, sex and ethnicity were collected for all patients approached to take part. For recruited patients, data were also collected on self-efficacy (ability to self-manage). Reasons given by patients declining to take part were recorded. Patients attending the educational session also completed an evaluation form to assess satisfaction. Results A total of 267 patients were approached, and 30% were randomly assigned. Lack of time (48%) and lack of interest (44%) were the main reasons cited for non-participation in the study. Men were significantly more likely to be recruited (p=0.048). The intervention was rated enjoyable and useful by 100% of participants. However, 37.5% of the intervention group failed to attend the educational session after recruitment. Participants failing to attend were significantly more likely to be older (p=0.039) and have lower self-efficacy (p=0.034). Conclusion The findings suggest that delivering and evaluating an effective structured group educational intervention to promote better blood pressure control in patients with CKD would be challenging in the current context of kidney care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byrne et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in Chronic kidney disease and hypertension (n=81). Structured group educational intervention (CHEERS) vs. Standard clinical management of hypertension was evaluated on Feasibility (recruitment, retention, and patient satisfaction). A structured group educational intervention for blood pressure management in early chronic kidney disease faced feasibility challenges, with a 30% recruitment rate and 37.5% of the intervention group failing to attend the session.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: