Key result
Multiple biomarker panels may improve diabetic kidney disease prediction over single biomarkers despite methodological pitfalls.
Why the study?
There is variability in diabetic kidney disease progression not fully captured by albuminuria, motivating research into additional biomarkers and biomarker panels for improved risk stratification.
Do biomarker panels improve risk prediction for renal function decline and end-stage renal disease in patients with diabetes compared to single biomarkers?
Do biomarker panels improve risk prediction for renal function decline and end-stage renal disease in patients with diabetes compared to single biomarkers?
Combining multiple biomarkers may improve risk prediction for diabetic kidney disease progression over single biomarkers, though methodological pitfalls in current studies need addressing.
Biomarker panels should not yet alter diabetic kidney disease risk stratification; leaves open superiority over single markers pending improved study designs.
Diabetic kidney disease is diagnosed and staged by albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Although albuminuria has strong predictive power for renal function decline, there is still variability in the rate of renal disease progression across individuals that are not fully captured by the level of albuminuria. Therefore, research focuses on discovering and validating additional biomarkers that improve risk stratification for future renal function decline and end-stage renal disease in patients with diabetes, on top of established biomarkers. Most studies address the value of single biomarkers to predict progressive renal disease and aim to understand the mechanisms that underlie accelerated renal function decline. Since diabetic kidney disease is a disease encompassing several pathophysiological processes, a combination of biomarkers may be more likely to improve risk prediction than a single biomarker. In this review, we provide an overview of studies on the use of multiple biomarkers and biomarker panels, appraise their study design, discuss methodological pitfalls and make recommendations for future biomarker panel studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schutte et al. (2015) conducted a review in Diabetic kidney disease. Multiple biomarkers and biomarker panels vs. Single biomarkers was evaluated on Prediction of diabetic kidney disease progression. Multiple biomarkers and biomarker panels may improve risk prediction for diabetic kidney disease progression compared to single biomarkers, though methodological pitfalls remain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: