Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: KEYNOTE-859 showed a favorable benefit-risk profile for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, in participants with untreated locally advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Outcomes after a median study follow-up of 4.5 years are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 1579 participants were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo plus chemotherapy every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response, all per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review, and safety. RESULTS: The median study follow-up was 54.8 months (Q1-Q3, 46.8-62.1) at data cut-off (27 September 2024). In the intention-to-treat population, the median OS was 12.9 months for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy compared with 11.5 months for placebo plus chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.86]. Median OS was longer in the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 (13.0 compared with 11.4 months; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84) and CPS ≥10 (15.8 compared with 11.8 months; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.77) populations. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 458 participants (58.3%) receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 388 (49.3%) receiving placebo plus chemotherapy; grade 5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 8 participants (1.0%) and 16 participants (2.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Extended follow-up confirms that first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improves efficacy and maintains a manageable safety profile compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 status, supporting this combination as a first-line treatment option for locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: