Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work presents an exposure-informed co-design of an 85-kHz Double-D (DD) wireless charging pad that preserves a target mutual inductance and installation footprint while minimizing losses in the conductive/ferromagnetic shielding. A finite-element electromagnetic model is coupled to a meta model-driven multi-objective search to generate a Pareto set; candidate designs are then screened by verifying magnetic- and electric-field compliance on prescribed paths. Relative to a reference geometry, the optimized pad halves shielding losses (≈56% reduction) at essentially constant mutual inductance (≈27.2–27.3 µH). A laboratory prototype confirms high DC-to-DC efficiency above 96% at 20 cm and measured magnetic-field profiles consistent with simulation, while electric-field exposure is assessed in simulation using a rolled-edge shield concept. The results show that surrogate-accelerated co-design can decouple electrical targets from exposure verification and deliver practical, compliant DD pads with materially lower shielding loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kindl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: