Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey study reveals dual cognitive paths driving academic well-being in college students, suggesting combined benefits of internal problem-solving and generative AI self-efficacy.
As generative artificial intelligence (GAI) becomes increasingly integrated into higher education and reshapes students’ learning experiences, important questions arise regarding how GAI-related competencies and higher-order thinking skills contribute to Academic well-being (AWB). Guided by the conceptual perspective of distributed cognition theory, this study proposed and tested a dual-path cognitive model of AWB. To support this investigation, we also developed the Inventory of GAI Use Self-Efficacy. For model testing, data were collected from 490 college students. The results supported the proposed dual-path model. Specifically, critical thinking dispositions and creativity competence were associated with AWB through creative problem-solving ability, whereas creativity competence and GAI use attitudes were related to AWB through GAI use self-efficacy. These findings suggest that AWB in the GAI era is associated with the synergistic integration of internal cognitive resources and AI-assisted external cognitive resources. The study contributes to the AWB theory and practice by: (a) evaluating a dual-path cognitive model that integrates higher-order thinking and GAI-related competencies; (b) identifying the possible intermediary roles of creative problem-solving ability and GAI use self-efficacy; and (c) providing a valid measure of GAI use self-efficacy for future research and educational applications in AI-enhanced learning contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pappachan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: