Why the study?
Do different structured exercise modalities improve peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak) in adults with coronary heart disease compared to control?
Meta-Analysis (n=7,760)
Do different structured exercise modalities improve peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak) in adults with coronary heart disease compared to control?
Interval aerobic exercise and combined aerobic/resistance training are associated with the greatest improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness among patients with coronary heart disease, with longer durations and higher weekly doses yielding greater benefits.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interval aerobic training should be prioritized to maximize VO₂peak gains in coronary heart disease; extends prior RCTs by ranking modalities via network meta-analysis.
How exercise interventions should be structured to improve peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak) in coronary heart disease (CHD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the relative effects of different exercise modalities on VO₂peak, identify study-level moderators of effect, and characterise dose-response relationships using meta-regression models. We systematically reviewed and synthesised 129 randomised controlled trials involving 7,760 participants with CHD. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to estimate the relative effects of various exercise modalities. To investigate heterogeneity, a meta-analytic random forest (MARF), interpreted with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), was employed to identify influential study-level moderators. Meta-regression models were used to examine dose-response relationships. Most exercise modalities were associated with improvements in VO₂peak relative to the control group. Interval aerobic exercise training (mean difference [MD] = 3.43; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 2.87, 3.99) and combined aerobic and resistance exercise training (MD = 2.49; 95% CrI: 1.81, 3.17) showed relatively larger estimated effects. Dose-response analyses indicated that greater weekly exercise dose was generally associated with larger improvements in VO₂peak, whereas per-session exercise dose showed an inverted-U-shaped association. MARF and SHAP analyses highlighted intervention length as an influential study-level moderator. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improves VO₂peak in adults with CHD. However, substantial heterogeneity and low-certainty evidence limit confidence in modality-specific rankings. Longer intervention duration and greater weekly exercise dose were associated with larger improvements in VO₂peak, suggesting that exercise dose and programme duration should be considered alongside patient characteristics, comorbidity burden, and safety when designing cardiac rehabilitation programmes. These exploratory and aggregate-level findings require prospective validation before guiding individualised exercise prescriptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=7,760). Interval aerobic exercise training vs. Control (no-exercise, usual care, or patient education) was evaluated on Change in peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak) (MD 3.43, 95% CI 2.87, 3.99).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: