Key result
High-intensity exercise training significantly increased peak oxygen uptake (MD 2.67) compared with moderate-intensity exercise training in patients with coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the effects of high-intensity versus moderate-intensity exercise training on cardiopulmonary function and exercise endurance in patients with coronary artery disease.
Does high-intensity exercise training improve peak oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold in patients with coronary artery disease compared to moderate-intensity exercise training?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,036)
Does high-intensity exercise training improve peak oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold in patients with coronary artery disease compared to moderate-intensity exercise training?
High-intensity exercise training is superior to moderate-intensity exercise training in improving peak VO2, LVEF, exercise duration, peak heart rate, and oxygen pulse in patients with coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-intensity exercise improves key cardiopulmonary metrics more than moderate-intensity in CAD; reinforces RCT evidence favoring higher-intensity cardiac rehab.
Purpose The study aims to evaluate the effects of high-intensity and moderate-intensity exercise training on cardiopulmonary function and exercise endurance in patients with coronary artery diseases (CAD). Methods We performed a systematic search of the English and Chinese databases from their inception to March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to compare high-intensity and moderate-intensity exercise training on cardiopulmonary function in patients with CAD. The primary outcomes included peak oxygen uptake (peak VO 2 ) and anaerobic threshold (AT). The secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), exercises duration (ED), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), resting heart rate (RHR), peak heart rate (PHR) and oxygen pulse (O 2 pulse). The continuous variables were expressed as mean differences (MD) along with their corresponding standard deviations (SD), and the I 2 test was applied in the assessment of heterogeneity. Results After systematically literature search, 19 studies were finally selected for our meta-analysis ( n = 1,036), with 511 patients in the experimental group (high-intensity exercise) and 525 patients in the control group (moderate-intensity exercise). The results showed that high-intensity exercise significantly increased patients' Peak VO 2 [MD = 2.67, 95% CI (2.24, 3.09), P < 0.00001], LVEF [MD = 3.60, 95% CI (2.17, 5.03), P < 0.00001], ED [MD = 37.51, 95% CI (34.02, 41.00), P < 0.00001], PHR [MD = 6.86, 95% CI (4.49, 9.24), P < 0.00001], and O 2 pulse [MD = 0.97, 95% CI (0.34, 1.60), P = 0.003] compared with moderate-intensity exercise. However, there were no significant differences in AT [MD = 0.49, 95% CI (−0.12, 1.10), P = 0.11], RER [MD = 0.00, 95% CI (−0.01, 0.02), P = 0.56], and RHR [MD = 1.10, 95% CI (−0.43, 2.63), P = 0.16]. Conclusion Our results show that high-intensity exercise training has more significant positive effects compared with moderate-intensity exercise training in improving peak VO 2 , LVEF, ED, PHR and O 2 pulse in patients with CAD, while no significant differences were observed in AT, RER and RHR. To sum up, high-intensity exercise training is better than moderate-intensity exercise training in improving cardiopulmonary function and exercise endurance in patients with CAD. Systematic review registration PROSPERO (CRD42022328475), https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease (n=1,036). High-intensity exercise training vs. Moderate-intensity exercise training was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) (MD 2.67, 95% CI 2.24, 3.09, p=<0.00001). High-intensity exercise training significantly increased peak oxygen uptake (MD 2.67) compared with moderate-intensity exercise training in patients with coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: