Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a case study on the deformation characteristics and stress evolution of a large-span variable cross-section crossover tunnel excavated by the mining method. Three construction alternatives are compared: Scheme 1 adopts staggered excavation of twin tunnels with transverse passages, Scheme 2 adopts sequential excavation of twin tunnels with transverse passages, and Scheme 3 adopts gradual expansion excavation without transverse passages. Quantitative comparison shows that: (1) schemes with transverse passages reduce sudden rock deformation by 21.7% compared with Scheme 3; (2) Scheme 1 reduces construction steps by 16 compared with Scheme 2, with only 0.14 mm difference in maximum ground settlement (within engineering tolerance); (3) grouting reinforcement of the middle rock wall reduces surrounding rock deformation by 21.7% and plastic zone width by 18.3%. The recommended temporary support removal length is 5–10 m, which ensures that the incremental vault settlement during removal is controlled within 2 mm, meeting the regional engineering safety standards. Field monitoring results of Scheme 1 show that all deformation indices meet the control requirements. This construction technology can be extended to similar subway crossover projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: