Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The traditional medical model has driven significant advances in oncology research; however, its excessive focus on molecular details, which hinders a holistic understanding of patients, has become increasingly evident as a limitation. As an emerging medical paradigm, holistic integrative medicine emphasizes a systems-thinking approach that regards the patient as an integrated whole and seeks multidimensional and temporally coordinated integration under three hierarchical goals: anticancer, tumor control, and patient centric care. Using holistic integrative medicine as the theoretical framework, this article provides a systematic review of a series of original research achievements by Chinese scholars published in leading international journals, aiming to elucidate the trajectory of paradigm evolution in oncology research in China. The analysis indicates a three-level progressive paradigm shift. At the molecular level, research has evolved from single targets to system-level networks, revealing the complex tumor ecosystem through cross-organ and cross-system interaction analyses. At the clinical level, therapeutic strategies have shifted from single modalities to multidisciplinary temporally coordinated approaches, achieving a balance between maximal efficacy and minimal toxicity through temporal integration of multiple interventions. At the system level, cancer prevention and management has transitioned from a disease-oriented model to whole-course care, encompassing prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. These paradigm shifts reflect a transition in Chinese oncology research from molecular reductionism to systems integration. Future research should move from descriptive integration toward quantitative and intelligent integration, establish a unified analytical framework, and systematically map the structural pathway for transforming oncology toward a holistic integrative medicine paradigm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: