Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective study reveals improved wait times and risk prioritization from nurse-led telephone triage in suspected head and neck cancer, indicating optimized specialist care pathways.
Background Head and neck cancer (HNC) referral conversion in the UK is less than 3%. A nurse‐led telephone assessment clinic (TAC) using the HaNC‐RC v.2 triage tool was introduced to identify high‐risk (HR) referrals. Methods Prospective data were collected from all HNC referrals ( n = 986) over 6 months, with descriptive analysis of TAC triage outcomes. Results Over 6 months, 986 referrals were reviewed, with a 4.4% ( n = 43) cancer conversion rate. Of 483 (49.0%) TAC patients, 115 (23.8%) were high‐risk (HR) triaged using the HaNC‐RC v.2 tool. Cancer was diagnosed in 8 (7.0%) HR and 3 (0.9%) LR patients (early thyroid malignancies), who were subsequently upgraded to HR ( p ‐value = < 0.001) with FDS compliance of 88% (95% CI: 83.5–92.1). Allowing for clinical capacity constraints, the first F2F clinical appointment with an HNC consultant was given to 63.1% of HR patients, and 7.7% of these patients were later confirmed to have cancer. HR and LR patients were seen within a mean of 9.2 and 10.2 days ( p ‐value = 0.043), respectively. The mean waiting time was improved from 10.7 days (1st month) to 5.9 days (6th month) for an HR clinic slot ( p ‐value = 0.04). Conclusion This service evaluation study supports the use of the HaNC‐RC v.2 at the 7.1% threshold in a TAC nurse‐led clinic model alongside an STT pathway. The TAC service facilitated optimised use of consultant clinic slots, prioritising HR patients without compromising LR patients' outcomes and facilitated a reduction in USoC clinic slot requirements whilst helping FDS target compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imperial et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: