Spinoza’s remarks on language are often treated as fragmentary and inconsistent with his philosophy. This paper argues that they become intelligible when situated within his account of the imaginative origin of language. Drawing on Part II of the Ethics, it shows how linguistic signs arise from stabilized associations among ideas and develops a unified account of universals, linguistic custom ( usus , consuetudo ), and the limits of cognitio ex signis , explaining both the emergence of meaning and its epistemic instability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giacomo Tore (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: