Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study reveals a nonlinear relationship between length of stay and in-hospital mortality in Alzheimer's disease, highlighting how evolving clinical course refines risk prediction.
Background: Hospitalizations among patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) carry substantial mortality risk, but length of stay (LOS) is time-dependent and may reflect heterogeneous inpatient trajectories. We examined unadjusted and adjusted LOS–mortality patterns and compared admission-only versus inpatient-course prediction using explainable machine learning. Methods: Using the full 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), we identified hospitalizations among adults aged ≥60 years with an ICD-10-CM G30.x AD code in any diagnosis position. Records with missing in-hospital mortality status were excluded. LOS was summarized in clinically interpretable bins and modeled using restricted cubic splines. Model A excluded explicit inpatient-course measures, whereas Model B added LOS, procedure count, and total charges. Performance was evaluated using patient-grouped 5-fold out-of-fold validation and summarized by AUROC and AUPRC; SHAP was used for interpretation. Results: Among 249,507 AD hospitalizations, 12,666 in-hospital deaths occurred (5.08%; weighted mortality 4.97%). Unadjusted mortality was highest at LOS 0–1 day (13.00%), lowest at 4–6 days (3.47%), and increased to 7.77% at ≥22 days. After multivariable adjustment, LOS remained strongly nonlinear, but adjusted predicted mortality declined across the modeled LOS range. Model A achieved AUROC/AUPRC of 0.780/0.180, whereas Model B improved to 0.828/0.329. Sepsis, diagnostic burden, acute kidney injury, age, stroke, and pneumonia were stable predictors; LOS and procedure burden added prognostic information in Model B. Conclusions: The crude LOS–mortality pattern was U-shaped, whereas the adjusted pattern suggests that the late-stay increase in unadjusted mortality is partly explained by patient complexity and evolving inpatient-course factors. Admission-only prediction provides meaningful early risk stratification, while inpatient-course information improves prognostic assessment as hospitalization evolves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alkam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: