Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study examines whether middle leadership (ML) and digital instructional leadership (DIL) are associated with teachers' innovative behaviour (TIB) and whether teacher self-efficacy (TSE) has an indirect association with TIB through these leadership variables in Indonesian vocational schools. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey of 350 teachers was conducted using SmartPLS 4 with the path-weighting algorithm and 5,000 bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap resamples. This study evaluated measurement quality, structural paths, indirect effects, explanatory power, partial least squares prediction (PLSpredict), and cross-validated predictive ability test (CVPAT). Findings ML and DIL were positively associated with TSE (ß = 0.513 and 0.412) and TIB (ß = 0.335 and 0.245); TSE was associated with TIB (ß = 0.445; all p < 0.001). Indirect associations through TSE were significant for ML (ß = 0.228, 95% BCa CI [0.173,0.288]) and DIL (ß = 0.183, [0.144,0.233]). R2 was 0.712 for TSE and 0.874 for TIB. All endogenous indicators had positive Q2predict, lower partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) errors than the linear benchmark, and significant CVPAT advantages. Extremely high reliability, elevated indicator variance inflation factors (VIFs), and heterotrait–monotrait (HTMT) = 0.899 indicate substantial measurement overlap. A domain-preserving reduced-item sensitivity analysis lowered the TSE–TIB HTMT to.873 and attenuated, but did not eliminate, the TSE→TIB and indirect associations. Research limitations/implications The single-wave, single-source design does not support causal mediation. The recruitment flow, school cluster, and response rate information were unavailable. The study also relied on adapted response scales and a global reflective measurement specification. Practical implications Higher education providers and school systems may pilot integrated middle-leadership, digital-instructional, and efficacy-building professional development, with independent outcome evaluation. Originality/value The study evaluates two leadership domains and combines explanatory and out-of-sample predictive assessments in an under-researched vocational school context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riswandi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: