Winter food conditions can shape behavioral investment, yet measured food mass and short-term foraging behavior need not covary. We quantified the potentially available food dry mass (FD), foraging-attempt rate (FAR), and 15 min behavioral time allocation of wintering black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis Przevalski, 1876) in five habitats across three sampling stages in Linzhou County, XiZang. Food was sampled in eight independent plots per stage × habitat combination, and 600 valid focal observations were analyzed under a working-independence assumption. Habitat, sampling stage, and their interaction were associated with both FD and FAR (all nominal p < 0.001 in the fixed-effects models). Unplowed farmland consistently had the highest FD and FAR, whereas riverbank and shallow-water areas generally had the lowest values. Foraging accounted for 59.2–75.3% of observed time. Because different plots and partly different valleys were sampled among stages, these stage-associated contrasts combine temporal and spatial variation. Plot-level FD–FAR relationships varied among habitats and stages, showing that measured dry mass and a 1 min behavioral rate were not interchangeable indicators of food accessibility, foraging success, or energetic payoff. Future work should revisit fixed plots, retain individual–flock–plot–session identifiers, and quantify food identity, burial depth, hydrological conditions, successful ingestion, and detection-corrected habitat use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: