Policy analysis reveals the rise and decline of mechanical biological treatment in French waste management, highlighting how regulatory mandates dismantled centralized technological fixes.
In France, the development of fermentable waste recovery sectors has been shaped by the emergence of so-called “mechanical-biological treatment” facilities – more commonly known as “MBT” plants – throughout the 2000s and 2010s. Promoted by major actors in the waste-management industry, these plants offered a turnkey technological solution capable of sorting and treating fermentable waste while converting it into compost. For local authorities, MBT plants represented a convenient technological fix that eliminated the need to mobilize citizens to adopt source-separation practices. However, this rapid expansion came to a halt in 2015 following the adoption of the Energy Transition for Green Growth Act (LTECV), which, in its Article 70, mandates “the widespread implementation of source separation of bio-waste.” This regulatory shift marked the culmination of a long-standing socio-technical dispute that had set advocates of MBT facilities against detractors for nearly two decades. Beneath this controversy lies a struggle for control over the “socio-technical imaginary” of biowaste recovery. In this paper, I show how the sociotechnical imaginaries associated with these recovery methods were shaped by waste-management stakeholders – specifically, how the imaginary of MBT plants gained traction in the 1990s and early 2000s, only to be subsequently discredited in the years that followed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
François‐Joseph Daniel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: