Generative artificial intelligence has made a longstanding assessment problem harder to ignore: a successful performance does not always provide sufficient evidence for the capability claim an institution intends to certify. This paper develops Resolution-Based Education (RBE) as a complete educational operating architecture that separates performance attainment from certification resolution. RBE preserves existing outcomes, marks, programme structures and assessment practices, but adds an explicit evidential question before a capability-bearing decision is made: does the available evidence distinguish learner possibilities that would require different certification decisions? The architecture connects educational purpose, programme outcomes, Resolvable Capability Outcomes, curriculum, pedagogy, learning evidence, performance assessment, a Resolution Gate, decision-targeted evidence acquisition, finite stopping, certification states, course and programme evaluation, governance and continuous improvement. When existing evidence is already resolution-adequate, the process stops with no additional assessment burden. When it is not, additional evidence is selected only to resolve the decision-relevant ambiguity, subject to validity, reliability, fairness, accessibility, privacy and burden constraints; unresolved cases may be deferred rather than forced into a false binary decision. The paper specifies the implementation sequence, reporting mathematics, governance requirements and a prospective validation design. RBE therefore treats certification as an evidence-to-decision problem: performance remains important, but a capability claim is made only when the evidence is adequate for the distinction being certified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Md. Amir Khusru Akhtar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: