The Absolute Relativity Conjecture (ARC) formulates the observed Universe as a Fun-damental Inverse Problem. The Observer (O) and the Universe (U ) arise as spatio-evolutivemanifestations of a single four-dimensional Continuum governed by an isochoric and bijec-tive law. Its admissible finite-scale deformations are described by the Z-Scale Tensor andsubject to the isochoric admissibility condition det(Z) = 1. Isochoricity makes any spatialdeformation inseparable from its Evolutive and mixed spatio-evolutive counterparts, so phe-nomena conventionally treated as independent become mutually constrained manifestationsof one common geometry.ARC reconstructs candidate geometries whose calculated datasets DC (U, O) must con-verge toward observed datasets DX (U, O). Prediction arises when a geometry constrainedby one subset of the observational dataset determines phenomenology withheld from thatreconstruction; unification is therefore defined as reciprocal reconstructibility under a com-mon identifiable admissible geometry. Successful reconstruction necessarily preserves estab-lished empirical results by reproducing them within DC (U, O); validation need not awaitnew phenomenology, because known observations withheld from the reconstruction can in-dependently test new predictions about the underlying geometric nature of already observedphenomena, including dark-matter-like and dark-energy-like regimes, while newly observedphenomena provide additional independent tests.A spherical and cyclic Elementary Absolute Relativistic Particle (EARP) provides a con-crete candidate realization. Under progressive reconstruction, the same morphology is in-dependently constrained by particle, gravitational, electromagnetic, dark-regime, compact-object, and statistical phenomenology. For unresolved EARP populations, each repetition ofan experiment corresponds to a definite absolute spatio-evolutive configuration that is gen-erally not reproduced across observer-equivalent repetitions; the resulting ensemble there-fore manifests observer-relative statistical outcomes, whose calculated distributions mustconverge toward the corresponding observed distributions. ARC is falsified if increasinglyprecise and diverse independent datasets persistently require mutually incompatible geome-tries, preventing reciprocal reconstruction under one common admissible geometry withoutsectorial ad hoc prescriptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enrique Juan Zamora Loureiro (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: