OBJECTIVES: To describe the adequacy and characteristics of emergency medical services education as assessed by a population-based sample of emergency medical technician (EMT)-basics and EMT-paramedics from the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians. METHODS: Stratified random samples of EMT-basics and EMT-paramedics from the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians were mailed a 46-item demographic survey and a 16-question education survey in 1999. RESULTS: Overall, EMT-basics and EMT-paramedics reported that course cost and distance to the course were not barriers. The majority of EMT-basic and EMT-paramedic respondents rated their course instructors and course materials as excellent or very good. EMT-basic and EMT-paramedic respondents felt that they were very well prepared from their training in the areas of trauma assessment (63% and 72%), medical assessment (59% and 65%), cardiac arrest management (64% and 76%), and airway management (69% and 77%), respectively. However, EMT-basic and EMT-paramedic respondents were less likely to feel very well prepared regarding childbirth (29% and 44%) and pediatric patient management (36% and 38%). Overall, EMT-paramedics were more likely to report being very well prepared for clinical activities and tasks from their training compared with EMT-basics. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that EMT-basics and EMT-paramedics were satisfied and felt well prepared by their certification courses. Opportunities to improve certification training exist, particularly related to childbirth and pediatric patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dawson∥ et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: